Communication piece on commercially available diagnostic tests

05 Apr 2021

The Global Schistosomiasis Alliance Diagnostic Workstream has developed a communications piece listing all commercially available diagnostics for schistosomiasis.

English | Communication piece on available diagnostics 09.04.2021

Español | Pieza comunicación pruebas diagnóstico disponibles 05.05.21

Português | Peça de comunicação diagnósticos disponíveis 05.05.21

Français | Pièce communication diagnostic disponibles 05.05.21

In 2012, World Health Assembly Resolution 65.21 called on countries to intensify control and initiate elimination campaigns where feasible. In the same year, the WHO defined control of morbidity as <5% prevalence of heavy intensity infection in school-aged children, and elimination as a public health problem as <1% prevalence of heavy intensity infection in school-aged children.

National NTD programmes and collaborating partners need to track progress towards reaching the WHO NTD Roadmap goals. Each country has a strategic or masterplan with specific objectives and actions to reach the control and elimination goals and to measure achievements through specific coverage and infection indicators.

Both infection prevalence and intensity are key indicators used by countries to monitor and evaluate interventions and to track progress towards control or elimination of the disease. Countries require sensitive diagnostic tools that are affordable and can be used in low-resource settings. It is therefore vital to gather information about currently available diagnostic tests. First, in order to know which tools are available and in which context they can be used, so that national programmes can have the right diagnostic tool for achieving their targets. Secondly, to identify the diagnostic gaps and requirements for schistosomiasis programmes moving from disease control to elimination as a public health problem, and for schistosomiasis surveillance post-transmission interruption. Finally, there is a need for further standardization of diagnostics tests and their output, in order to increase transparency of collected data and improve comparability of surveys or the outcome of different intervention programs.

The Global Schistosomiasis Alliance (GSA) Diagnostic Work Stream has gathered information on commercially available diagnostic tests for schistosomiasis in order to make this information accessible to Ministries of Health, policy makers, schistosomiasis researchers and other stakeholders*. The focus is on schistosome endemic regions, but the outcome is also likely to facilitate decisions about how to improve the diagnostic workflow for imported schistosomiasis cases in non-endemic settings. The best diagnostic tool will depend on different factors, such as the setting where it is going to be used, the species of Schistosoma to be detected, and the goal or strategy of the programme. Higher sensitivity and specificity will be needed when moving towards elimination goals, or when diagnosing returning travellers in non-endemic areas, typically showing low intensity infections. However, when the aim is to reach morbidity control, the focus would probably be on ease-of-use and low cost to be used as a Point-Of-Care / Point-Of-Need test. In this case, an ideal diagnostic test would follow the WHO ASSURED criteria (Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and robust, Equipment-free and Deliverable to end-users).

The following tables (table 1a, 1b and 1c) list currently commercially available diagnostics. Not all are recommended by WHO or GSA . The diagnostic methods that are currently recommended by WHO are the microscopy methods – Kato-Katz (KK) on faecal samples for the diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis, and Urine Filtration (UF) for urogenital schistosomiasis. These methods, although specific, lack sensitivity. In addition, in S. mansoni transmission areas, WHO also recommends the Point-of-Care test based on circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) detection. While schistosome circulating antigens reflect the presence of viable worms (current infection), specific antibodies cannot distinguish past and/or present infections. Consequently, antibody detection tests are not suitable for identifying current infections. The GSA Diagnostic Work Stream hopes to update this list as new diagnostics become available. Please contact the GSA office for comments, updates or additional information.

*The table is not a list of recommended tests or a list of tests to be used by stakeholders, this is only an information piece collating what is currently commercially available. Manufacturers should be contacted to find out intended and appropriate use as well as details on methodology, logistics, cost and safety. As diagnostic test properties are dependent on locally performed procedures and endemicity characteristics, it is important to follow diagnostic protocols as indicated by the provider and also to perform proper test verification in your own settings. Where appropriate, participation in an external quality assessment scheme is recommended. This information was collected by consulting a number of stakeholders and reaching out to manufacturers for more information. Where information is missing this is because this was not easily available and/or the manufactures did not respond to requests for more information. The GSA and its members and partners take no responsibility for any incorrect information or inadequate or negative outcome from the use of these diagnostics tests.

Tool Kits and Guides Monitoring and Evaluation GSA